Sign in to follow this  
  1.  Forums

    1. 4
      items
    2. 4
      items
      • No content here yet
    3. LawAccess

      LawAccess is a free government service that provides legal information, referrals and in some cases, advice for people who have a legal problem in San Andreas.

      2
      items

Activity Feed

  1. Earlier
  2. Superior Court of San Andreas Los Santos Branch Bar Association, Registered Lawyers Kevin Goodman
  3. Superior Court of San Andreas Los Santos Branch Questions & Answers If you have any questions related to the courts, please ask them here and you will receive a response. This is only for
  4. Timeline & Overview of a Typical Criminal Case This overview is meant to provide you with a broad understanding of what to expect in your San Andreas criminal defense case. The timeline for criminal cases differs widely depending on many different factors, but this timeline below (which correlates with the headings on this page) should give you a general idea of what to expect. * This is a general timeline for a criminal case; some cases can be resolved in as little as a few days after arrest, and other cases many not be resolved for years. The Crime A criminal case begins when there is evidence that a crime has been committed (CLICK HERE to learn the difference between felony crimes and misdemeanor crimes). Evidence of a crime is usually in the form of a citizen's statement, or physical evidence. Citizen's statements can take the form of a victim's statement, a 911 call, an eyewitness statement, or someone calling in a tip. Physical Evidence usually consists of the discovery of drugs, weapons, stolen property, recordings, DNA, fake IDs, or anything else that can be linked to the commission of a crime. Pre-Arrest Investigation After a law enforcement agency has some kind of evidence that a crime has been committed they will initiate an investigation. Typically, there are four steps to a pre-arrest investigation. The law enforcement agency will: Determine that a crime was actually committed; Determine who committed the crime; Collect evidence sufficient to make an arrest of the person they believe committed the crime; and Locate the offender and make an arrest. To accomplish the pre-arrest investigation, law enforcement officers may do any or all of the following: Interview victims, witnesses, and suspects. Examine the crime scene and surrounding areas for evidence such as weapons, clothing, video footage, or DNA. Check records such as sign in or sign out sheets, computer files, or work logs. Search homes, cars, storage units, etc. for evidence such as stolen property, documents, or weapons. Surveillance of the suspect. Use undercover agents to gain information. Talk with friends, family, neighbors, or other acquaintances. If a person is arrested at the scene of the time, there is no need for a pre-arrest investigation. CLICK HERE to learn more about what laws and constitutional rights protect defendants from certain police investigations. Arrest Before any arrest can be made, a law enforcement officer must have probable cause. Probable cause exists when the law enforcement agency can point to some evidence that suggests a certain suspect probably committed the crime in question. A law enforcement officer does not usually need a warrant to make an arrest. If a warrant is needed to make an arrest, the law enforcement officer must present evidence to a judge who will then decide whether or not the evidence is sufficient to issue an arrest warrant. If the judge finds that the evidence is not sufficient to meet the "probable cause" standard, then the warrant will not be issued. CLICK HERE to read more about when a law enforcement officer can make an arrest, and whether or not an arrest warrant is needed. Booking After the arrest, a law enforcement officer will take the individual to a police facility where the arresting officer can search the arrested person for evidence related to the crime. For example, if the arrest is drug related, the police officer will search the person looking for drugs. That person will then be booked. Bring booked, usually means that the arrested person is photographed, fingerprinted, and his/her name, the time of arrival, and the offense for which the person was arrested, are all written in a log. A law enforcement officer may attempt to get a statement from the arrested individual at this time. Once booked, the arrested person is usually allowed one telephone call. After the phone call, a more thorough search of the arrested person and the person's belongings will take place. The arrested person will then either be placed in jail, or, for lesser crimes, the person may be released. Law enforcement agencies across the state have established their own policies for what works best for their officers and in their facilities. Therefore, the steps outlined above may differ slightly between agencies. Post-Arrest Investigation In addition to the search of the defendant's person and their belongings upon arrest, the arresting law agency may place the defendant in a lineup, have a witness view the defendant, or take a photo of the defendant to show other potential witnesses. The police may also obtain handwriting samples, DNA, hair, etc. that can be compared to evidence found in other investigative efforts. Now that the defendant is in custody, questioning is much easier. Questioning officers have a duty to inform a defendant in custody of their Miranda rights. CLICK HERE to read more about Miranda rights. The post arrest investigation will continue on throughout the case, perhaps consisting of the state talking with witnesses, obtaining search warrants, gathering documents, etc. Defense Investigation Normally the accused will contact an attorney for the first time after they know they are being investigated for a crime, or after they have been arrested. As soon as the accused contacts an attorney, their attorney will begin the defense investigation. The defense will contact witnesses, subpoena evidence, and gather information useful to the defense in both presenting their version of the facts and defending against the prosecution's accusations. Official Charge & Filing the Complaint An initial criminal charge may be made by the arresting officer, but the prosecutor ultimately decides what a defendant should be charged with. A prosecutor has several options as he proceeds. The prosecutor may move forward with exactly the same charges for which the officer arrested the defendant, the prosecutor may add additional charges, or the prosecutor may waive some charges and move forward on others. A prosecutor may also device to elevate an initial charge -- for example, a 2nd degree felony to a 1st degree felony. The prosecutor then files a complaint, sometimes called a "charging documents" or an "information", with the court (see an example of a complaint here). A complaint is simply a document that details the crime the state has charged a person with. Occasionally prosecutors, after receiving all of the evidence, decide not to go ahead with any charge. In this scenario, no complaint will be filed, and the suspect will be released from law enforcement custody without ever having to go to trial. Guilty Plea & Acceptance (( Disclaimer: Specifically written for LSRP due to limited court resources, and is considered "legal". In particular, this allows an officer to be the prosecutor and issue a sentence without going to court, providing the defendant pleads guilty.)) The defendant may accept the charges presented by the officer or prosecutor at the time by pleading Guilty. If the defendant pleads guilty, they will be charged with the recorded charges, penalties and fines by the arresting officer, and serve the sentence provided by the officer or prosecutor (which can come in the form of jail time, financial penalty, community service, warning, etc). It is up to officer discretion to offer time served while in police custody. This usually depends on compliance from the defendant but is not always the case. If the defendant wishes to plea Not Guilty or No Contest, then the case will continue to court. First Appearance in Court & Misdemeanor Arraignment The defendant's first appearance in court is usually a very brief hearing in which a judge will inform the defendant of the official charge and tell the defendant of their legal rights. If the defendant is accused of a misdemeanor, arraignment will take place during this first apperance. An arraignment is a formal reading of the criminal charges, by the judge, in the presence of the defendant. After the formal reading, the defendant enters a plea (e.g. guilty, not guilty). If the defendant is accused of a felony, the arraignment will take place after the preliminary hearing (see "Felony Arraignment" below). The defendant will have no opportunity at this first appearance to present evidence or share their version of the facts. However, if desired, a defendant can present an affidavit (a sworn statement), usually through their attorney, which states the defendant's side of the story. During this first appearance, the court will also determine if the defendant is eligible for a public defender (a free attorney employed by the state). Eligibility for a public defender depends on the financial situation of the defendant. Bail & Bail Bonds (( Disclaimer: Specifically written for LSRP, and is considered "legal". The prosecution (instead of the court) will set bail at x4 the total amount of all charges without a judge, regardless if guilty or not guilty & the charges. )) After being booked, defendants are sometimes released from custody on their own recognizance. This means that the individual promises to appear in court at a later date. In other instances, defendants are held in custody and the officer or prosecutor sets a bail amount at x4 the amount of all accused charges. The bail amount is what has to be paid/guaranteed in order for the defendant to be released out of custody. There are several types of bonds that can be obtained by a defendant who does not have access to the cash necessary for bail: Property Bond: The accused, or someone acting on their behalf, puts up a piece of land or a house equal to the bail amount set by the prosecution. If the defendant fails to appear for their court hearings, the state can take the land or house to recover the bail amount. Surety Bond: A third party agrees to be responsible for the bail amount for defendant. This is usually done by a bail bondsman. Typical, a bail bondsman will immediately collect a percentage (10% - 15%) of the total bail amount, and will make a guarantee to the court that the defendant will appear on their scheduled court dates. If the defendant does not appear, the bail bondsman must pay the defendant's total bail amount. Since the bail bondsman is taking a risk that the defendant may flee and the bail bondsman will be stuck paying the bail amount. Here is an example of how this works: Prosecution sets bail at $5,000. Bail bondsman collects a $500 non-refundable fee, and requires that some asset (a car, for example) is provided that is worth $5,000. If the defendant does not show up to court, the bail bondsman pays the court $5,000 and then takes permanent possession of the car also worth $5,000. If the defendant appears at all necessary court dates, then the car is returned to it's owner. Cash Bond: Sometimes the court will set bail as a "cash only" bond. This simply means that the court will not accept anything besides cash for release of the defendant. When a defendant has posted bail, the court sometimes imposes restrictions upon the defendant such as a requirement for home detention, drug testing, mandatory check-in calls to the police, relinquishing passports, etc. Preliminary Hearing The purpose of a preliminary hearing is to force the state to present evidence showing that it has probable cause to believe the defendant committed the crime they are being charged with. This means that the prosecutor has to show the judge that it is more likely than not that the defendant committed the crime. This is a very low standard and fairly easy for any prosecutor to meet, especially considering the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard that must be met at trial. Think of it this way, to meet the “probable cause” standard a prosecutor must show that there is a 51% chance the defendant committed the crime. To meet the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard a prosecutor must show there is about a 95% chance the defendant committed the crime. If the state succeeds in showing it has probable cause that the defendant committed the crime, the case will go forward. If the state does not succeed, the case will be dismissed and the defendant must be released. If bail was paid, this must be refunded in full. Three Reasons to have the Preliminary Hearing: A preliminary hearing sometimes provides the defendant and defense attorney with a sense of the prosecution's idea, legal theories, and strategies that he will use later on in trial. Knowing this information can help you prepare. The defendant and defense attorney will hear the witness testimony at the preliminary hearing and have the opportunity to cross examine those witnesses. This can be an opportunity for the defense to gather useful information and get an idea of what the witnesses might say at trial and how comfortable the witness is on the stand. Chances are, the same witnesses that testify at the preliminary hearing will also testify at trial. Knowing how they reacted to questioning the first time around can be helpful to examine them on the witness stand the second time around. With the information learned during preliminary hearing, an attorney may device to take action and file certain motions with the court. For example, if the preliminary hearing a witness testifies as to the defendant's prior criminal record, the defense attorney can anticipate that the prosecution intends to use the defendant's prior criminal record as evidence at trial, and can therefore petition the court to preclude that criminal record from coming in as evidence. Three Reasons to NOT have the Preliminary Hearing: Waiving a preliminary hearing can create "good will" with the prosecutor. Prosecutors typically don't like to have preliminary hearings because they require a fair amount of work to prepare for. When a defendant waives a preliminary hearing, he is lightening the prosecutor's work load and showing a sign of good faith. Prosecutors often appreciate this and may be more likely down the road to cut you a slightly better deal because you cut them a deal. Waiving a preliminary hearing can be a bargaining chip for the defendant. E.g. "I will agree to waive the preliminary hearing if the prosecutor reduces my charges from a second degree felony to a third degree felony". Sometimes preliminary hearings are a waste of time for everyone. Sometimes the defendant and their attorney already know what evidence the prosecution is going to put on to establish probable cause and the prosecutor is not budging on any plea deals. In this case, it may be more productive for the defense attorney to spend their time on something more pressing and crucial to your defense. Grand Jury San Andreas does not typically have grand jury proceedings. However, when a grand jury is called, it takes the place of a preliminary hearing. A grand jury is a private hearing (rather than the public, preliminary hearing) where the prosecutor presents evidence to a jury and the jury devices whether to file an indictment or to dismiss the case. An indictment is a formal accusation that the defendant has committed a crime. The defense attorney is not allowed to be present during a grand jury proceeding. Felony Arraignment and Entering a Plea After the preliminary hearing, a judge will typically set a date for the defendant to come back for arraignment. This is where the defendant is brought before the court, informed of the charges against him, and asked to enter a plea. In San Andreas, there are six kinds of possible pleas: Not Guilty; Guilty; No Contest; Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity Guilty with a mental illness at the time of the offense; and An alternative plea of not guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity. At this stage, a defendant typically pleads not guilty because either: The defendant's intention is to go to trial, or The defendant is willing to change his "not guilty" plea to a "guilty" plea after the prosecutor offers a deal. It's a painless process to change a "not guilty" plea to a guilty plea, but there are several complications in changing a "guilty" plea to a "not guilty" plea. After a defendant has entered their plea, the judge will usually set a trial date for a few weeks down the road. Hearings, Appearances in Court, and Pre-Trial Motions After the defendant's preliminary hearing and indictment, there will be several times the defendant comes back to court before going to trial. These appearances in court may be for the purpose of updating the judge concerning the process of the case, alerting the judge to certain issues, negotiating with the prosecutor, or the hearing a "motion". A "motion" is a request, by the prosecutor or the defendant, for the court to take certain action on an issue. Below are a few examples of motions that can be filed with the court: Motion to Pressures: A motion to suppress seeks an order from the court to withhold certain evidence from being used at trial, and is usually filed when the defendant feels the police violated his constitutional rights in order to obtain evidence. For example, a defendant may petition the court to withhold evidence of his confession, a 911 call, the presence of drugs at the crime scene, or items seized in a search. Motion in Limine: While the line between a motion to suppress and a motion in limine is quite blurry, generally, a motion in limine is a motion to exclude certain evidence from being brought into trial because the evidence violates the "San Andreas Rules of Evidence". This is different than a motion to suppress because a motion to suppress deals with evidence that may not violate the San Andreas Rules of Evidence, but may violate the defendant’s constitutional rights. A motion in limine may seek to exclude things such as evidence of the defendant’s prior criminal record, certain evidence that is irrelevant to the crime, medical records, defendant’s financial records, a witness statement, or evidence that may cause the jury to have unfair prejudice towards the defendant. Motion to Compel Discovery: The term "discovery" refers to the act uncovering of evidence. Both the defendant and the prosecutor are entitled to see certain evidence that is being held by the other. A motion to compel discovery occurs when one of the parties is not allowing the other to see certain evidence they are entitled to see. For example, the defendant may request a copy of a video recording taken from a police dash cam during the defendant's arrest. If the prosecutor does not provide that video to the defendant, a defendant may file a motion to compel the discovery. If the judge grants the motion, the prosecutor must provide the defendant with the video. Any other Motions: A motion can be filed for just about any purpose that the defense or prosecutor can think up and put down on paper. For example, the defense may file a motion to have an independent agency test any DNA in evidence, have the jury visit the scene of a crime, motion to restrict the publicity of a case, motion to withdraw a guilty plea, motion to reduce bond, motion to weigh contraband, etc. After the defense decides to file a motion, they will schedule a hearing and subpoena witnesses to come to that hearing. At the hearing, both the prosecution and the defense will put on evidence in an attempt to persuade the judge to rule on the motion in their favor. A judge will typically make a decision to grant or deny the motion at the conclusion of the hearing, but occasionally a judge may not rule on the motion for a few days. Trials (( Disclaimer: Specifically written for LSRP, and is considered "legal". It is not always possible to have a full jury, and jury trials are unlikely to happen. The minimum has been set at 5 for criminal cases. If numbers can be brought together, then it is a jury trial will be an option. A judge also must be a unique player which is not involved in the case. )) If there is no plea agreement, then a trial will ensue. Criminal cases are usually presented to a judge. In a San Andreas criminal case, the judge will device if the defendant is guilty or not guilty. There are two trials that can occur: Bench Trial - in a bench trial, the defense and procecution put on evidence before a judge, not a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the judge will make a finding of guilty or not guilty. Jury Trial - trial by a minimum Jury of five, see more information below. Jury Selection (Jury Trial Only) The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution grants a criminal defendant the right to be tried by a jury of their peers. Sometimes a jury consists of twelve jurors, sometimes nine, but in a San Andreas felony case a jury can never have fewer than five jurors. Each member of the jury is selected from a people living within the jurisdiction of the court that tries the case. Usually, several dozen people are called to the courthouse for this one case -- this is called a "jury Pool". Not all of the people in this jury pool will actually be on the jury. Instead, the defense and the prosecution will pick which jurors serve on the jury. Both the defense and the prosecution usually have some kind of idea as to which type of person will be the most beneficial for their case. The judge then permits the defense and the prosecution to ask questions to the jurors. Based on a juror's answers to these questions, the defense or the prosecution may choose to "strike" that juror. The defense and prosecution can usually "strike", or get rid of, four or five jurors each. For example, if the prosecution asks the jurors, "do any of you have a problem believing police officers", and one of the jurors says "yes", it is likely the prosecution will "strike" that juror from the pool and they will be sent home. The prosecutor may do this because he intends to have a police officer testify during the trial and wants jurors who are going to believe the police officer's testimony. Opening Statements The attorney on each side will present an overview of their version of the case to the judge/jury, and forecast what they believe the evidence will show. State/Prosecution's Case in Chief After opening statements, the prosecutor/state will present all of its evidence in an attempt to convince the judge/jury that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It's important to note that every crime has certain "elements" that the prosecutor must prove in order for the defendant to be found guilty. A prosecutor will attempt to show the defendant's guilt through the use of witness testimony, victim testimony, documents, video recordings, audio recordings, records; or in short, all the "evidence". While the plaintiff is presenting their case in chief, the defense will have the opportunity to cross examine witnesses (ask questions to the state's witnesses in court), object (e.g. object to the plaintiff showing a certain document to the jury), and make motions. Defense's Case in Chief After the state has presented its case in chief, the defense will now put on all of it's evidence in order to convince the judge/jury that the defendant is not guilty. There are several common senses used in a San Andreas criminal defense case, such as: self defense, alibi, insanity, entrapment, duress, and defense of habitation. The same rights afforded to the defense during the state's case in chief are now afforded to the state during the defense's case in chief (e.g. to cross examine witnesses and object). Closing Arguments These arguments are calculated to point out to the judge/jury in very plain terms why the specific evidence presented should lead the judge/jury to conclude one way or the other. Jury Instructions (Jury Trial Only) After closing arguments the judge will instruct the jury as to the law that should be applied. This law, along with other jury instructions, is put into a packet and given to the jury for reference. The jury's charge is to think about all of the evidence presented to them, apply that evidence to the law, and decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty. Jury Deliberations & Verdict (Jury Trial Only) After the jury has been instructed, they are removed from the courtroom to discuss the case and come to a conclusion as to whether or not the defendant is guilty or not guilty. In a San Andreas criminal case, a jury's decision must be majority. Once the jury has reached a verdict, they will be brought into the court room and the judge will the majority verdict. Judge's Findings (Bench Trial Only) After closing arguments, the judge will consider all of the evidence presented to them, and apply that evidence to the law, and decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty. Guilty Verdict If the defendant is found guilty, and the defendant is out on bail or was never taken into custody at that time. The defendant will return to court at a later day for sentencing. Otherwise, the sentences will be issued at the same time. Not Guilty Verdict If the defendant is found not guilty, and the defendant was previously in custody, the defendant may likely need to go back to a holding facility before release. Otherwise, they will not need to be processed and can be released. Sentence Hearing After a defendant has been found guilty, their sentence is decided by the judge. Typically the officer and/or prosecutor will prepare a per-sentence recommendations based on several factors, including the defendant's prior convictions, probation and parole history, personal history, friends, education, gang affiliation, and employment history. They will generally make a recommendation as to what they believe the sentence should be, but the judge may deviate from this suggestion. The judge has four basic types of sentences available: Financial sanctions: The judge can impose fines and restitution orders on the offender. Release: The judge may release the offender into the community with or without restrictions. Restrictions the judge may impose on the offender might be probation or house arrest. Incarceration: The judge may sentence the offender to time in jail or prison. Community Service: The judge may release the offender into the community, requiring a set amount of (real) hours of community of community service. Both the defense and the prosecution will have the opportunity to persuade the judge towards one outcome or another. In some cases ,witnesses may be called. For example, the prosecution often has a victim speak to the judge about the harm the defendant has caused them and the victim frequently will ask the judge to impose a more severe sentence. Or, the defense has one of the defendant's children, or a sick grandmother the defendant takes care of, speak to the court concerning the hardship it would cause on them, if the defendant was to be incarcerated. Appeals (( Disclaimer: Specifically written for LSRP due to limited court resources, and is considered "legal". You may only submit an appeal once, and go through an criminal appeal once. Constant appeals or abuse of this will result in OOC administrative action or severe IC repercussions.)) In San Andreas, the convicted defendant is allowed to appeal their conviction and/or the sentence one time. In most cases, the convicted must file a file notice of appeal within 30 (real) days from the time of judgement If the defendant is found not guilty by a jury, the prosecution may not appeal because this violates the "double jeopardy" rule. Grounds for appeal may be, among other things, ineffective assistance of legal council, improper admission of evidence, false arrest, jury misconduct, prosecutor misconduct, or improper exclusion of evidence. The reversal rate in felony cases in the United States is 5% - 10%. This statistic also includes those cases which were only partially reversed. Credit to Red Law, Utah for the information.
  5. About LawAccess What is LawAccess? LawAccess is a free government service that provides legal information, referrals and in some cases, advice for people who have a legal problem in San Andreas. We are a starting point to help you with your legal problem. How can LawAccess help me with my legal problem? We can: give you legal information, including fact sheets, forms, and publications in some cases, arrange for a lawyer to give you legal advice refer you to another service, for example, if you need a specialist legal service What type of legal problems can I get help with? We can help you with a wide range of legal problems or questions about: going to court a crime a fine or traffic offence a debt your family or relationship domestic or family violence a dispute with your neighbour a problem at work buying goods and services a motor vehicle accident planning ahead (wills, powers of attorney, enduring guardianship). Can I get legal information online? Yes, you can get legal information from the LawAccess section of this site. You can use our website to: find easy to read legal information about a wide range of legal issues access step-by-step guides and practical tools for dealing with your legal problem without a lawyer in the Representing Yourself section. The Representing Yourself section of this website can help you if you are dealing with a legal problem or representing yourself in a court. You will find: information about a range of different legal topics including debt, car accidents, fines, fences, employment rights, recovery of goods, driving offences and crime, and what to do after someone dies step by step guides to running a case instructions for preparing letters, legal documents and court forms sample letters, documents and forms flowcharts and interactive guides checklists and frequently asked questions information on alternatives to court. Can I get legal aid? We can hel;p you work out if legal aid may be available for your legal problem and if you meed the legal aid means test. What if I need a private attorney? If you do need a private attorney, we can provide you with a list of details of up to three private attorneys who cover the type of law you need assistance with. Who operates Law Access? Law Access is a San Andreas Government initiative that works in conjunction with the San Andreas Bar Association.
  6. Superior Court of San Andreas Los Santos Branch BAR Information The Woodland County BAR is a registrar of all practicing attorneys within the county. The purpose of the BAR is to maintain a accurate registrar and qualify attorneys to practice in the county based on their merit and skill, and to ensure that all citizens and residents of the county can entrust these practitioners of law to be honest, diligent, intelligent, respectful and courteous. Admission to the BAR Any individual over the age of eighteen whom has received a credible education from a nationally recognized law school may challenge the BAR examination ((A quick verification that you have a basic understanding of U.S law)). Once practicing, they may pick a specialty of practice and work independently or through a firm. Due to the counties small size, there are not dedicated public defenders at this time. Any licensed attorney may be called upon to be a public defender on a case-by-case basis and will be compensated appropriately. BAR Application Please fill out the following application and mail it in ((Reply in this thread))
  7. Superior Court of San Andreas Los Santos Branch Job Opportunities The following job opportunities are posted, effective today August 2nd, 2019. Interested applicants may email a letter of interest to @Psihusky Court Justice Job Functions: Oversee Civil and Criminal court cases fairly, justly, and in practice of best policies and procedures. Rule on cases in jury and non-jury trials. Observe, research, and decide on various motions such as Relief from Abuse orders, Search Warrants, Arrest Warrants, Injunctions, etc. Reflect the Superior Court in a positive light in public and in private. Always be publicly impartial on various political and legal issues. Other common-sense duties as directed from the Chief Justice. Qualifications: Registered Attorney on the San Andreas BAR At least five years experience as an attorney. In depth knowledge of court proceedings. Preferred: Previous experience as a criminal or civil judge. San Andreas District Attorney Job Functions: Act as the civilian Chief Law Enforcement Officer for all law enforcement activity in San Andreas. Act as civilian oversight for all law enforcement agencies functioning in the area. Prosecute criminal crimes against individuals accused of them within the jurisdiction. Represent government divisions, agencies and subdivisions in civil suits against them. May appoint and supervise Assistant District Attorneys and District Attorney Investigator’s to assist in job functions. Qualifications: Registered Attorney on the San Andreas BAR In depth knowledge of court proceedings, filing for criminal procedures and understanding of law enforcement. Preferred: Several years experience as an attorney.
  8. Superior Court of San Andreas Los Santos Branch CIVIL PETITIONS Any individual, group of individuals, corporate entity, business, or organization who feels they have been wronged, either under Local Ordinance, County Ordinance, San Andreas Penal Code & Statutes, Federal Law, binding contract, or common law may file a civil petition in this court against the violating party. You have up to 60 days after the perceived wrongdoing to file a civil case against an defendant(s) Please use the following format and title the thread: Topic Thread Title: [CIVIL] (Plaintiff Name) V. (Defendant Name) Topic Contents:
  9. Superior Court of San Andreas Los Santos Branch SUMMARY OFFENSE APPEALS Any individual who has been accused of an summary offense (a very minor infraction which is not entitled to a jury trial, usually traffic or parking violations) may file an appeal if they think the penalty is unjust or crimes accused untrue. You have up to 30 days after being issued a summary offense to appeal the conviction. Please use the following format and title the thread: Topic Thread Title: [SUMMARY APPEAL] (Your full legal name) Topic Contents:
  1. View Full Stream